Skip to Content [alt-c]
In reply to It's Now Possible To Sign Arbitrary Data With Your SSH Keys
It's good that OpenSSH team added the signing but I wouldn't use it: - Inconvinient command line. Why the signing tool is called ssh-KEYGEN? Arguments are difficult to understand. The allowed signers file should be juset created somewhere in a default location. - Again as with signify the OpenSSH team decided to use own format instead of standard PKCS#7. Extensions of signatires aren't specified. Here you used .sig but this is already used by PGP and other programs like Kleopatra will be unable to open it. The cryptogtpgaphy needs a wide adoption but here fragmentaions only increased. - namespaces is somemthing really weird and just won't be used in wild.
Reply
Your comment will be public. To contact me privately, email me. Please keep your comment polite, on-topic, and comprehensible. Your comment may be held for moderation before being published.
Your Name: (Optional; will be published)
Your Email Address: (Optional; will not be published)
Your Website: (Optional; will be published)
>
monospaced
Post a Reply
Your comment will be public. To contact me privately, email me. Please keep your comment polite, on-topic, and comprehensible. Your comment may be held for moderation before being published.